- MEDICAID COMMISSION
- TESTIMONY BEFORE THE MEDICAID COMMISSION
|
MEDICAID COMMISSION
|
| |
This fourth meeting of the Medicaid Commission, March 13 -15, was held in
Atlanta this week, the first one held beyond the Washington, DC area. The
meeting is focusing on long term care. ANCOR, our national
association, urged providers to attend and to bring family members and
people with disabilities to offer 3-5 minute testimony. NYSACRA sponsored
Margaret Puddington, a parent from NYC that many of you know who developed
the Coalition of Families to Support the Direct Support Worker, to attend
and provide testimony. Margaret’s testimony was very powerful and a number
of Commission members responded positively. Her testimony is below.
The Commission has established a new web site with new information,
documents, and meeting notices
http://aspe.hhs. gov/medicaid. For list of Commissioners, (two
non-voting from New York), charter (purpose), previous meeting notices,
presenters and public comments, visit this web site.
It is rumored that there will be another session on long term care, possibly
in May in Texas. The Commission provides little or no advance information.
By December 31, 2006, the Commission will make longer-term recommendations
on the future of the Medicaid program that ensure the long-term
sustainability of the program. |
| |
|
| |
|
Testimony Before the
Medicaid Commission
|
| |
Good morning. My name is Margaret Puddington. I live in New York City.
My younger son, Mark, is 25 years old and has significant developmental
disabilities. He has mental retardation, physical impairments, and he cannot
speak. Every task of daily life is an enormous struggle for him, whether
it’s opening a door or putting on a shirt. Yet he is an extraordinary
person, with an irresistible smile and a great talent for making friends.
Living with Mark presents profound challenges. He is still very dependent on
us for most aspects of his care. He demands constant attention. At times he
behaves in some very unpleasant, and even dangerous, ways. My husband and I
are not so young any more. I have a heart condition, and my husband is
legally blind, and his vision has deteriorated to the point where he simply
cannot do certain chores for Mark anymore. Our daily lives are exhausting
and acutely stressful.
We survive because of the services we receive. Medicaid funds an in-home
training service, which provides experienced workers who come to our home
weekly to work with Mark on specific goals. This service helps Mark develop
skills, such as hand washing, that will eventually make him less dependent
on others. There is another benefit to this service, too: it gets me through
the week by giving me time off from child caring responsibilities. I need
these breaks - to run errands, to go to a doctor’s appointment, or just to
spend a quiet moment with my husband.
Another invaluable service we rely upon, also funded through Medicaid, is
overnight respite, where Mark spends occasional weekends together with a few
other young men with disabilities, supervised by well- trained staff.
Overnight respite gives Mark the healthy experience of socializing with
people his own age and learning to rely on staff, not Mommy and Daddy, for
assistance. My husband and I love these tension-free weekends. Both
overnight respite and in-home training renew our energy, reduce our level of
stress, and give us the strength to continue to keep Mark home with us.
During the day, Mark attends an adult day program, also funded through
Medicaid. There he is learning many independence skills, doing some
volunteer work with his group, and, for the first time, accepting
responsibility for certain chores. For my husband and me, this program is
absolutely critical. Because Mark goes to a day program, my husband and I
can work, can be productive, can have an identity aside from “caregiver.” We
cannot imagine how we would survive without it.
These three services are the linchpins that hold our family life together.
There is absolutely no question that without them, we—along with thousands
of other families in the same situation—would have been forced to seek
residential placement years ago. These services sustain our families; they
are not luxuries. And they have saved government many millions of dollars a
year in residential services.
Nevertheless, the time is coming when residential services, also funded by
Medicaid, will become a necessity for Mark and the many others like him who
cannot take care of themselves. Residences are the most critical of all
services for our children, especially when we parents pass on. Residential
services will govern all aspects of Mark’s life, and the quality of those
services will absolutely determine the quality of his life every minute of
the day.
We families are terrified at the prospect that Medicaid cuts could decimate
all of these critical services for people with developmental disabilities.
Medicaid cuts would mean no new residential services. I cannot bear to think
of what would happen then. A parent’s heart attack or death would leave even
someone as vulnerable as Mark without a safe, staffed place to live.
As for residences that already exist—and day programs, too—Medicaid cuts
would do to them what funding cuts did to New York’s Willowbrook state
institution for people with disabilities decades ago. Budget cuts slashed
the staffing and resulted in horrendous abuse and neglect. Medicaid cuts
today would have the same result. Programs would be overcrowded and staffing
would be cut. People would sit idly day and night, neglected, while
overburdened staff responded to noncompliant people by screaming at them. Or
worse.
We parents will never subject our children to that kind of treatment. We
have learned the lessons of Willowbrook, and government should have, too.
One of the most critical lessons is that staff are our most precious
resource. Even now, the greatest challenge in our field is that inadequate
salaries of direct support staff are making it extremely difficult to hire
and retain qualified staff. Staff have enormous responsibilities and receive
extensive training in everything from medication administration to behavior
management, alternative communication systems, and teaching strategies. But
just as important: staff are the people who will tie our children’s shoe
laces, take care of them when they have fever, console them when they are
sad. When we parents are no longer around, staff will be the most important
people in our children’s lives. That is why parents’ number one priority now
is to get significant raises for direct support staff so that they can
afford life’s basic necessities. As it is, staff commonly juggle two or even
three jobs just to get by. It breaks our hearts when our children’s favorite
staff quit because they can’t make a living in this field. We are desperate
for Medicaid to fund salary increases so that staff can make the decent
living they deserve.
On behalf of the families of people with developmental disabilities, I urge
you not to cut Medicaid funding for long-term services for people with
developmental disabilities. I also urge you to raise salaries of the direct
support staff so critical to the safety and well-being of our children.
Please do not compromise on these issues. All of us are counting on you to
help us protect our very vulnerable children.
Thank you.
Thank you Margaret! |
|
|